Close Menu
Unipath
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Unipath
    • English
      • Русский (Russian)
      • العربية (Arabic)
      • Kurdish
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Features

      The Illegality of Restricting the Strait of Hormuz

      November 10, 2026

      A Humanitarian Helping Hand

      November 3, 2026

      Inspired Gambit 2026

      November 3, 2026

      Holding the Line

      November 3, 2026

      United Over the Arabian Gulf

      November 3, 2026
    • Departments
      1. Senior Leader Profile
      2. Around the Region
      3. Key Leader’s Message
      4. View All

      Wisdom in Service of Country

      November 3, 2026

      A Protector of Ports

      March 5, 2026

      Building a Professional Naval Force

      December 31, 2025

      Professionalism in the Service of Counter-Terrorism

      August 11, 2025

      Egypt and France Enhance Maritime Security

      November 3, 2026

      Saudi Arabia’s Ambitious Defense Modernization Program

      November 3, 2026

      UAE, Malaysia Enhance Bilateral Relations

      November 3, 2026

      Houthis target Yemeni academics

      November 3, 2026

      Key Leader’s Message

      November 3, 2026

      Key Leader’s Message

      August 11, 2026

      Key Leader’s Message

      March 25, 2026

      Key Leader’s Message

      January 2, 2026

      Wisdom in Service of Country

      November 3, 2026

      Key Leader’s Message

      November 3, 2026

      Egypt and France Enhance Maritime Security

      November 3, 2026

      Saudi Arabia’s Ambitious Defense Modernization Program

      November 3, 2026
    • About Unipath
      • About Us
      • Subscribe
      • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Archive
    • English
      • Русский (Russian)
      • العربية (Arabic)
      • Kurdish
    Unipath
    Home » The Illegality of Restricting the Strait of Hormuz
    Features

    The Illegality of Restricting the Strait of Hormuz

    The concept of transit passage, not innocent passage, governs navigation through international straits
    By LT. COL. RICHARD J. CONNAROE II, U.S. ARMYNovember 10, 2026Updated:November 10, 202604 Mins Read
    Oil tankers transit the Arabian Gulf off the coast of Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates, before the Iranian conflict. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link

    Foreign warships, auxiliary vessels, commercial ships and aircraft navigate international straits under the customary right of transit passage, codified in Part III (Articles 37-44) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Iran’s assertion that passage through the Strait of Hormuz is restricted to innocent passage represents a targeted lawfare effort to erode global freedom of navigation. Arabian Gulf partners must consistently exercise and affirm transit passage rights — and not apply the concept of innocent passage — through the strait to maintain regional maritime security.

    Under international maritime law, innocent passage and transit passage represent distinct legal concepts that govern how foreign ships and aircraft travel through waters along coastal states. Innocent passage applies within territorial waters, while transit passage applies to international straits, which are corridors that connect one part of the high seas or exclusive economic zone to another.

    Crucially, neither innocent passage nor transit passage permits a coastal state to mandate prior notification or authorization. However, transit passage provides broader navigational freedoms that are essential to national defense and global commerce.

    Innocent passage balances a coastal state’s right to its territorial sea, which is up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline, and foreign commercial transit rights. Under UNCLOS Articles 17 through 20, foreign vessels may exercise passage on the surface of the territorial waters provided passage is “continuous and expeditious” and not prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal state.

    Ships anchor off of Dubai, United Arab Emirates, in May 2023, preparing to transit the Strait of Hormuz.         THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Activities such as weapons practice, surveillance, launching aircraft or stopping in situations other than an emergency render passage noninnocent. Although coastal states may regulate safety and environmental conservation and, under certain circumstances, temporarily suspend innocent passage, Article 26 prohibits levying tolls or transit fees merely for passage.

    Conversely, transit passage guarantees unimpeded navigation and overflight through international straits. Under UNCLOS Article 38 and customary law, coastal states cannot impede, hamper or suspend transit passage. Transit passage prevents a coastal state from choking global trade and military mobility, especially when territorial water rights of coastal states cover an entire strait. Further, Article 39 permits vessels and aircraft to transit in their “normal modes of continuous and expeditious transit” — meaning submarines may navigate submerged and military aircraft may conduct formation flying and routine operations, provided they refrain from the threat or use of force against the coastal state.

    Iran intentionally mislabels transit passage as innocent passage to advance its lawfare campaign to forcefully alter international law. Lawfare is the use — or misuse — of law to achieve a policy objective. Tehran has threatened transit levies, mandatory reporting and restrictions on foreign naval movements and attempted to justify these measures under a veneer of legitimacy by citing the 1958 Territorial Sea Convention. Iran insists the 1958 convention — not UNCLOS — governs the Strait of Hormuz. This legal theory fails under scrutiny.

    The navigational provisions of UNCLOS, including transit passage, which Iran signed in 1982, have crystallized into customary international law, binding on all states regardless of ratification status. Furthermore, although the old 1958 standard used the term “innocent passage” for both territorial waters and international straits, even under Article 16(4) of the 1958 Convention, coastal states are strictly prohibited from suspending innocent passage through an international strait. Iran is not only applying the wrong law but misapplying it at its own choosing.

    Arabian Gulf partners play an indispensable role in maintaining established international maritime law. Conceding to an innocent passage framework in the Strait of Hormuz effectively legitimizes Tehran’s attempts to rewrite customary law by force. By consistently conducting transit passage — in surface, subsurface and air domains — through the Strait of Hormuz, Arabian Gulf nations reinforce established international law and preserve stability, security and prosperity across the Middle East and beyond.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWisdom in Service of Country

    Related Posts

    A Humanitarian Helping Hand

    November 3, 2026

    Inspired Gambit 2026

    November 3, 2026

    Holding the Line

    November 3, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Securing Borders | Volume 14, Number 1 Summer 2026

    Subscribe Today

    Subscribe to our mailing list to get the latest edition of Unipath.

    Unipath
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    © 2026 Unipath. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.