Close Menu
Unipath
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Unipath
    • English
      • Русский (Russian)
      • العربية (Arabic)
      • Kurdish
    • Home
    • Features

      Protecting the Red Sea

      May 13, 2025

      Commanding a Naval Coalition

      May 7, 2025

      Securing The Seas

      April 25, 2025

      A Multinational Medical Mission

      April 25, 2025

      A Convoy Across the Arabian Peninsula

      April 10, 2025
    • Departments
      1. Senior Leader Profile
      2. Around the Region
      3. Key Leader’s Message
      4. View All

      A Special Soldier to Command Special Forces

      April 9, 2025

      A Forceful Voice Against Violent Extremists

      October 18, 2024

      Service to the State

      January 24, 2024

      Educating Lebanon’s Future Leaders

      December 4, 2023

      Kuwait, U.S. enhance defense partnership

      April 9, 2025

      Counterterrorism on Turkmenistan-U.S. Agenda

      April 9, 2025

      Jordan Battles Regional Malign Influence

      April 9, 2025

      Kyrgyz Republic Builds Strategic Ties with State of Montana

      April 9, 2025

      Key Leader’s Message

      April 11, 2025

      Key Leader’s Message

      January 13, 2025

      Key Leader’s Message

      August 6, 2024

      Key Leader’s Message

      March 19, 2024

      Key Leader’s Message

      April 11, 2025

      A Special Soldier to Command Special Forces

      April 9, 2025

      Kuwait, U.S. enhance defense partnership

      April 9, 2025

      Counterterrorism on Turkmenistan-U.S. Agenda

      April 9, 2025
    • About Unipath
      • About Us
      • Subscribe
      • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Archive
    • English
      • Русский (Russian)
      • العربية (Arabic)
      • Kurdish
    Unipath
    Home»Features»Improving Military Intelligence
    Features

    Improving Military Intelligence

    UnipathBy UnipathFebruary 25, 2021Updated:March 10, 2021No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link

    Security Requires Anticipating the Actions of Terrorist and Nonstate Actors

    ISSAM ABBAS AMIN, SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORATE, IRAQI MINISTRY OF DEFENSE

    How sound is our intelligence in predicting events in our sometimes unpredictable world? The answer to this question is critical for security professionals in the Middle East and elsewhere. We must remember that wars are fought on a foundation of information, and that this foundation is growing ever more doubtful and uncertain.

    For these reasons, we must carefully examine the soundness of our intelligence service operations. The success of intelligence operations depends entirely on the availability of raw information and on the ability of intelligence analysts to distinguish correct and reliable information from misleading and inaccurate information.

    This general understanding of intelligence is often challenged by military organizations, which insist one should trust only confirmed information and adhere to total caution. These same organizations nonetheless demand that intelligence be predictive, as intelligence forms the basis for military operations.

    Drawing conclusions from what the enemy has done before, or what he is doing now, is usually of relatively little use to a commander or military planner, since he usually is getting this information from forces already engaging with the enemy. What a leader needs most is the ability to anticipate the enemy, that is, to proactively direct his forces and exploit the enemy’s movements.

    To do that, he must know the enemy’s likely intentions. He must pry into the minds of enemy commanders as they gather to make decisions. The best way to achieve this is through predictive intelligence. This does not mean that intelligence should ignore the past or the present, because studying these can predict future intentions. But intelligence reports should always be forward-looking.

    Despite an awareness that predictive intelligence is important, strategic surprises (such as sneak attacks) have been common throughout history. The situation today suggests a major shift in the nature of these attacks, which often leave intelligence services facing embarrassing questions. How did it happen? When was it planned? How did the penetration occur? And sometimes the greatest question of all: Who are the perpetrators of the attack? 

    In other words, in a strategic sense, a surprise attack is an intelligence failure for the attacked state and a success for the attacking state. All of this is due to the progress made in the intelligence world and special operations that are precise and subtle.

    What happened in Iran in July 2020 confirms the truth of these assumptions. Numerous explosions took place in sensitive areas that were difficult to penetrate, indicating an element of surprise. This is irrefutable proof of the failure of Iranian intelligence. Therefore, “intelligence failure” studies of strategic surprises may yield important conclusions about what went wrong.

    But the main problem is that the intelligence apparatus’s attempts to correct “what went wrong” constantly fail because they do not want to admit that their basic assumption, namely that intelligence can be predictive, is wrong. Intelligence cannot be rigorously predictive, which is why surprises cannot be avoided entirely.

    This leads us to recognize the importance of adopting a risk-management approach, which cautions us to develop resilience to strategic surprises, first to minimize losses and then to improve our intelligence capabilities to limit further surprises. It may be useful to mention some of the most important causes of predictive error:

    1. Making poor assumptions.
    2. Having a bias.
    3. Making decisions under pressure.
    4. Changing targets and plans.
    5. Changing the environment.
    6. Overestimating personal ability.
    7. Failing to adopt new information.

    In the end, intelligence services find themselves facing new challenges. The most serious of these challenges relates to the awareness of a changing security environment that is usually volatile, unknown and complex, and therefore outside control of the state. In many cases, the state no longer directs the loyalty of its citizens. All signs at present point to greater difficulty in navigating the intelligence future because of the number of elements no longer under the control of the state.  

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJordan’s Approach to Counterterrorism
    Next Article A Decade of Progress

    Related Posts

    Protecting the Red Sea

    May 13, 2025

    Commanding a Naval Coalition

    May 7, 2025

    Securing The Seas

    April 25, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    V13N1

    Subscribe Today

    Subscribe to our mailing list to get the latest edition of Unipath.

    Unipath
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    © 2025 Unipath. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.